Archive for June, 2009

10 Budget Coin Picks….

10 Budget Picks

indian head nickel By Mike Thorne, Coins Magazine
June 29, 2009

When faced with the assignment to pick 10 (or more) great coins that retail for $100 or less, I have at least two big problems: First, how do I limit my list to just 10 coins? Second, and this is often the bigger problem, how do I keep myself from trying to buy all the coins I’ve talked about?

Before presenting my list of coins and the reasons I chose them, let me establish some ground rules. First, the coin values will be based on the May 2009 issue of Numismatic News “Coin Market.” Second, the grade of the coin will be the one with a value closest to but below the $100 limit. Generally speaking, if I like a particular coin in one grade, I like it in all collectible grades. Thus, if a coin is worth $100 in Extremely Fine, I would also urge you to buy two of it in Very Fine if it’s worth $50 in that grade, and so on.

If you’ve read any of my articles and columns over the years, then you’re probably aware of my preference for certified coins, particularly coins certified by the major services. My reasons for recommending certified coins are that if you buy them you will avoid the potential problem of getting an altered or counterfeit piece, you won’t have to worry about whether the coin has been cleaned or had its surface altered in some way, and your new acquisition will come in a holder that’s desirable for long-term storage. In addition, the coin is likely to be accurately graded.

Notice that I said “likely to be accurately graded.” I’m a firm believer in the admonition to buy the coin, not the holder. In other words, I think you should learn to grade for yourself and should only buy coins that you feel are at least the certified grade and have the look that you like. I have seen coins certified in high mint state or proof grades that I wouldn’t want, because I think they’re ugly, usually because they’re darkly toned or they look cleaned. Of course, this may be just the look that you like. My point is that you should purchase a coin based on whether or not you like it, not on the grade on the holder and the price.

Finally, don’t be afraid to stretch a bit on what you have to pay for the coin. The coins I’ve selected are scarce coins with good demand. Over time, they’re almost guaranteed to be worth more than you paid for them. With that background, here’s my top 10.

1. 1908-S Indian Head cent in Very Good-8. This is a coin I find hard to resist. For one thing, it was the first cent coined in San Francisco, the first branch-mint cent, in other words. For another, it had a mintage of just 1,115,000 pieces, which gives it the third lowest mintage of any Indian Head cent. Not only that, but if it were a Lincoln cent, it would also have the third lowest mintage, nudging out the much more expensive 1914-D for that ranking.

On top of all the reasons I’ve given you, you can still purchase a circulated specimen for less than $100. It’s worth $77 in Good-4, $82 in VG-8, and just barely tops the $100 mark at $105 in Fine-12. I would urge you to buy one or more of this date as soon as you can, however, as this is a coin that I fully expect to be too high priced to make a $100 list in the not-too-distant future.

About the date, Richard Snow, writing in A Guide Book of Flying Eagle and Indian Head Cents, says, “These cents are scarce and popular, so demand is high. Many come with weak feather tips. Search for fully struck examples.” Of course, this tip about weak feather tips is irrelevant if you’re searching for examples that cost less than $100.

Other scarce Indian Head cents that you should still be able to find for less than $100 in G-4 include the dates from 1869-1872. I predict that they’ll all surpass the $100 level in the future.

2. 1911-S Lincoln cent in EF-40. Like many collectors, I got started with the Lincoln cent, and I spent many hours searching through rolls and even sacks of wheaties. Actually, they were all wheaties when I started collecting.

It turns out that 2009, as the 200th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth, is a great year for picking a Lincoln cent for my top-10-under-$100 list. With the spotlight on the series, good things are bound to happen with better, early dates. And the 1911-S is definitely a better date.

With a mintage of just slightly more than 4 million pieces, the 1911-S is the best, mintagewise, of the early S-mint semi-keys. In EF-40, the 1911-S lists for $75, and it’s only $105 in AU-50. In A Guide Book of Lincoln Cents, David Bowers calls it “a key date in all grades,” and I won’t argue with that.

If you believe, as I do, that Lincolns are poised for better things valuewise, then another good date to consider is the 1924-D, which is still valued below $100 in some decent circulated grades. It’s a $60 coin in VF-20, and with a mintage of slightly more than 2.5 million pieces, you should put it on your list along with the 1911-S. That mintage places the 1924-D fifth on the list of regular-issue Lincoln cents, behind only the 1909-S V.D.B., the 1931-S, the 1914-D, and the 1909-S, all of which are at or past the $100 mark in all collectible grades.

3. 1924-S or 1926-S Buffalo nickel in F-12. This time I’m giving you two coins for the price of one. In terms of mintage, these two dates rank fourth and first, respectively, with the 1926-S being the only date of which fewer than 1 million pieces were struck (970,000). Both dates are right at the $100 mark in F-12 ($96 and $100, respectively), and both take a huge leap in VF-20 ($455 and $375, respectively).

In The Complete Guide to Buffalo Nickels (3rd edition), David Lange writes the following about the 1924-S: “In low grades, 1924-S is yet another issue that performed poorly between 1960 and 1990, only to make an impressive recovery since then.” A 1924-S in F-12 should have decent design detail but not enough to qualify it for the major price increase that occurs at the next level. You should buy one quickly if you want to get it under the $100 level, however, as I think it’ll soon surpass that dividing line.

As indicated above, the 1926-S is already at the $100 level in F-12. Lange writes, “In the first edition of this book, published in 1992, I made the observation that 1926-S nickels grading F seemed undervalued. The market evidently agreed, as revealed by the price advance from 1990-2000, this value then doubling since 2000.” I would urge you to seek out nice examples of this date in this grade before the price doubles yet again.

4. 1913-S Barber dime in VG-8. I find this date hard to resist. With a mintage of just 510,000 pieces, the 1913-S ranks second in the entire series, behind only the key date, 1895-O (440,000). Despite this super-low mintage, the 1913-S is worth only $50 in VG-8, although it does surpass $100 in F-12 ($120).

The key to the value (or I should say, lack of value) of the 1913-S is hoarding, according to David Lawrence, writing in The Complete Guide to Barber Dimes. Recognizing its low mintage at the time, collectors saved the 1913-S, with the result that it’s more plentiful than some other Barber dimes with higher mintages. Its low mintage continues to be attractive, however, and “collector demand keeps the price up.” I look for it to continue to rise and urge you to salt away a few while the price is still so reasonable.

5. 1926-S Mercury dime in VF-20. This is one of several Mercury dimes with a relatively low mintage. In fact, with just 1,520,000 produced, the 1926-S has the fifth lowest mintage of the entire series, behind only the 1916-D, the 1921 and -D, and the 1931-D. Here’s what David Lange, writing in the second edition of The Complete Guide to Mercury Dimes, has to say about the date: “Fairly common in grades Good through Fine, grades VF and higher are genuinely scarce.”

But in VF, the 1926-S is not excessively expensive at $70. In EF-40, it jumps to $290, so I would urge you to buy the coin in VF at your next opportunity. I would expect it to pass the $100 mark in that grade fairly quickly.

Before I leave the series, I would like to point out that the 1921 and 1921-D can still be purchased in a collectible grade for less than $100. The more plentiful of the two, the 1921, lists for $60 in G-4 and $75 in VG-8. Although Lange writes that it is common in grades VG and below, I predict that the price will continue to rise because of demand.

The 1921-D lists for $78 in G-4 and is well above the $100 mark in VG-8 ($125). I think we will soon see solid Gs selling for $100 and up. If you can find a nice one at a good price, jump on it.

6. 1913 Barber quarter in F-12. I like Barber coins in general and Barber quarters in particular. Beyond the big three (1896-S, 1901-S, and 1913-S), the series contains several scarce dates with mintages well below 1 million pieces. Of course, the big three have long since passed the $100 mark in any grade.

This has not happened for any of the other dates in the series, although the 1914-S is getting pretty close at $82 in G-4. Interestingly, only 264,000 pieces were struck of the 1914-S, which is the same mintage as the much more expensive 1916-D Mercury dime. The 1914-S has the fourth lowest mintage of the series.

Just 484,000 pieces were struck at the Philadelphia Mint in 1913, which gives the date the fifth lowest mintage in the series. I suspect the 1913 suffers by comparison with its companion date, the 1913-S, which had a mintage of just 40,000 and is fast approaching the $2,000 mark in G-4.

According to David Lawrence’s second edition of The Complete Guide to Barber Quarters, the 1913 is “very scarce because of its low mintage, but saved to some extent.” He classifies it as R4 (”Scarce. May or may not be available at larger shows.”) in F/VF, and “Coin Market” values it at $75 in F-12. A nice VG-8 at $26 would also seem to be bargain priced.

7. 1913 Barber half dollar in VG-8. It wasn’t all that many years ago that I could list the three lowest mintage Barber halves (1914, 1915, and 1913, in that order) in an article about great coins selling for $100 or less. Today, only the 1913 is left, the one with the highest mintage (188,627). To put this mintage in perspective, the two key dates in the Walking Liberty half dollar series, the 1921 and 1921-D, both have mintages over 200,000 and both have long since passed the $100 mark in any collectible grade.

In The Complete Guide to Barber Halves, David Lawrence rates the 1913 as R3 (”A tough date. Only a few likely to be found at larger shows.”). This is the same rating he gives the 1914 and 1915. The 1913 lists for $77 in G-4 and $88 in VG-8. Care to wager how long it will be before this is a $100 coin in any grade?

8. 1921-S Walking Liberty half dollar in VG-8. In terms of mintage, at 548,000 produced the 1921-S ranks fifth in the series, behind only the 1921-D, 1921, 1938-D, and 1916-S, in that order. With the exception of the 1938-D, which is worth $90 in G-4 and $100 in VG-8, the other three dates are above the $100 line in all collectible grades. In G-4, the 1921-S lists for $46, and it’s still only $70 in VG-8. It takes big leaps in value thereafter, going to $220 in F-12 and $750 in VF-20. From there on, it fully deserves its status as the “King of the Walkers.”

If you can find decent specimens under $100, I would urge you to buy them, particularly if they just miss the requirements for a F-12. You can see how close the 1938-D is to the $100 mark in G-VG, and I believe there are more of it available than the 1921-S. Which would you think is the better buy?

9. 1886-S or 1889-S Morgan dollar in EF-40. This is another two-for-one deal, as both of these coins have similar mintages and similar values. With a mintage of 750,000, the 1886-S lists for $90 in EF-40. With a slightly lower mintage (700,000), the 1889-S is actually a little less expensive in that grade ($82).

I like any Morgan dollar with a mintage under 1 million pieces, and the 1886-S and 1889-S are two good dates to acquire. According to David Bowers, writing in A Guide Book of Morgan Silver Dollars, these are two dates that weren’t released at the time of their mintage. “By the second decade of the 20th century the [1886-S] was considered to be one of the great rarities in the series, exceeded only by the ‘impossible’ 1889-S. Both issues were mostly stored in the San Francisco Mint. Beginning about 1942, and continuing until the 1950s, the San Francisco Mint had quantities available for the asking, and many went to the Nevada casinos, but there was no numismatic market.”

In his encyclopedia of silver dollars, Bowers estimated the survival of “25,000 to 50,000 [1889-Ss], which for a Morgan dollar is not many.” His estimate of 20,000 to 40,000 of the 1886-S is similar. Look for coins with nice color that don’t have the appearance of being cleaned, and buy all you can afford.

10. 1927 Peace dollar in MS-60. Here, I was tempted to give you another two-for-one selection, but the coins would have to be in different grades. Specifically, I’m talking about the 1927, which I’ve listed, and the 1927-S. Both have mintages below 1 million pieces, and both can be purchased in decent collectible grades for less than $100. Actually, I would look for the 1927 in MS-61 or MS-62 rather than in MS-60, which can be a pretty bad-looking coin.

With a mintage of 848,000, the 1927 is worth only $70 in MS-60, with a jump to $185 in MS-63. Although its mintage is slightly higher at 866,000, the 1927-S is more expensive, with a value of $80 in AU-50 and $148 in MS-60. Bowers reports that the 1927-S is characterized by weak strikes, so keep your eyes peeled for better strikes of this date.

Well, that’s my list of 10 (actually more than 10) great coins that can still be purchased for less than $100 apiece in decent collectible grades. As you should be able to guess, I could easily put together several other lists of 10 great coins. For example, I didn’t mention any coins that are typically collected by type rather than by date. Just last night, I bid in a Heritage Exclusively Internet auction and won a nice-looking 1831 Liberty Cap 25-cent piece, graded VG-10 by ANACS, for less than $75. This is a coin with a “Coin Market” value of $95, so it could have been on a less-than-$100 list.

The point is that there are literally dozens of great U.S. coins that combine scarcity with relatively low prices. With a little study, you, too, can compile your own list of sub $100 coins that are fun to own and almost guaranteed to increase in value. Of course, you may find yourself bidding against me if you’re trying to buy them at auction. Good luck.

Comments

Chinese Government Wants To Purchase Another $80 Billion Of Gold!

Chinese Government Wants To Purchase Another $80 Billion Of Gold!

   

By Patrick A. Heller
June 30, 2009

Nine weeks ago, the Chinese government admitted to the mainstream media that it had added 14.6 million ounces of gold reserves from 2003 through 2009. For years before that disclosure, several of us non-mainstream media members had reported this activity to smaller audiences.

It wasn’t until about June 9 that the mainstream media was told that the Chinese government was planning to purchase an additional huge quantity of gold. The information became public when U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) was interviewed on Fox News by Greta Van Susteren.

Kirk accompanied Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on his trip to China in May. While the Chinese were laughing at Geithner during his speech at Beijing University for claiming that the U.S. dollar was strong (By the way, laughing at a speaker is a major social no-no in China, a sign that Geithner’s comments were not respected at all!), Kirk was engaged in a private conversation with lesser Chinese officials. In this non-public discussion, Kirk was told that the Chinese were extremely concerned about the likely near term decline in the U.S. dollar because of the explosion of government debt. As part of the reaction to this concern, the Chinese government had established another reserve to stockpile petroleum and was planning to purchase another $80 billion of gold (about 85 million ounces at today’s price level).

Kirk’s revelation about the Chinese plan to purchase another $80 billion of gold was the very last comment in the interview. This extraordinary news received almost no coverage until last week when multiple hard-asset Web sites picked up the interview.

This information is not fresh news, even though the mainstream media did not report it until Kirk’s interview. For instance, I discussed the substance of it in the April 28 edition of this column. Let me repeat the relevant paragraph for you:

“By the way, the way the Chinese government operates is not open and direct. Changes in policy are signaled by speeches or papers by lesser officials. And [as] has been shown repeatedly, when the Chinese government issues a statement that it is considering something such as purchasing gold, they really mean that they have already been actively doing it. It is entirely possible that China’s central bank gold reserves are much higher than they now confirm.”

So, when the Chinese, by their indirect method, disclosed that they plan to purchase another $80 billion of gold, you can just about guarantee two facts. First, the Chinese are already buying this gold. Second, the amount of gold planned to be purchased is larger than they stated.

How much is 85 million ounces of gold in relation to anything? The potential International Monetary Fund (IMF) gold sale that has been bantered about since 2002 as a means to knock down the price of gold is less than 13 million ounces. Annual worldwide gold mine production is roughly 60 million ounces. The Central Bank Gold Agreement, covering governments, central banks, and official organizations such as the IMF that hold about 80 percent of the world’s official gold holdings, limits annual sales to 16.1 million ounces.

How can the Chinese accumulate this much more gold without the spot price rising significantly? The simple answer is that this is not possible. The price of gold is going to have to rise by a lot, much faster than mainstream financial experts want us to believe. The price will not rise in a straight line, but the longer you wait for any ‘pullback’ to offer a buying opportunity, the greater your risk that you might not be able to purchase anywhere close to current gold price levels.

This past weekend, I attended the International Paper Money Show in Memphis, Tenn. I was surprised how many dealers, whose livelihood does not involve trading gold at all, told me that they regularly read this column and have personally laid in a good stash of physical gold for their own protection.

Provided by numismaster.com

Comments

Russia 10 roubles 2009 - Adygeya

Submitted by World Coin News
New bimetallic circulating commemoratives:
“The Russian Federation: Republic of Adygeya”

LINK: Bank of Russia
Visit 1800blogger to see all of our industry leading blogs.

Comments

What is a Short Set of Coins?

What is a Short Set of Coins? Short Set is defined on this coin terms glossary page.

Comments

Russia 10 roubles 2009 - Adygeya

New bimetallic circulating commemoratives:

“The Russian Federation: Republic of Adygeya

LINK: Bank of Russia

Comments

Why Some Rare Coins are Undervalued….

Why Are Some Rare Coins Undervalued?

By Doug Winter on Sunday, April 5, 2009
Filed Under: Tips for New Collectors, Featured, Commentary and Opinion, US Coins

By Doug Winter www.RareGoldCoins.com

Why are some coins clearly undervalued? I could answer this question existentially and say “because some have to be.” But the answer to this question is worth a little more exploration. Here are some things to consider about the valuations of coins.

1867 Quarter EaglesFirst and foremost, many of the areas of the rare coin market are thinly traded. In some cases, published prices for coins are speculative due to no examples having ever traded or they represent older price levels that have not been updated in many years. There are times when I am trying to figure what to bid for a very special rare coin at auction and I’m not sure I can scientifically pinpoint the exact price level. This can even be the case with coins that aren’t all that special but which haven’t traded in a long enough period of time to make their current value baffling.

Coin values are predicated by a supply and demand ratio. I have used this scenario enough times that it is now a semi-cliché but consider the following. If there are ten examples known of a certain coin but only three people care, it has an oversupply and its value is probably not very high despite its rarity. But if the same coin has thirty avid collectors than it will probably have a strong level of value.

This supply vs. demand situation is why some truly rare coins remain undervalued. As an example, look at a coin like the 1867 quarter eagle. Only 3,200 were struck and the most recent PCGS population figures show that just twenty-four have been graded. Despite this fact, the current value in AU55 is a whopping $1,500 or so. Shouldn’t this be a $3,000 or even a $5,000 coin? In theory, yes it should. But practical experience dictates that the level of demand for 1867 quarter eagles, which is virtually non-existent, keeps the price low. Advocates of the 1867 quarter eagle will counter with the argument “well, if this were an Indian quarter eagle with a population of twenty-four in all grades, it would be worth 10x in AU55.” In theory, this argument has merit. My counter-argument would be that the Indian Quarter Eagle series is many times more popular with collectors and that this is essentially an apples to oranges comparison.
 
The coin market is clearly becoming more and more researched-based as time goes by but I think the entire pricing system we have is antiquated. Let’s get back to the point I made in the second paragraph, about the market having thinly traded areas. These infrequently traded series are often compounded by a lack of good pricing information. I am always impressed by collector-dominated series like early Large Cents or Bust half dollars that have databases of pricing information available to collectors. The rare gold coin market doesn’t have this (yet) and I think it would be a real shot in the arm if someone were able to produce a price guide that helped dealers and collectors accurately determine values.

What I’d like to see even more is for an appearance-specific price guide to exist for these coins. Collectors of early Large Cents classify coins by three categories: choice, average and “scudzy.” Let’s say collectors are offered a certain die variety of 1796 Large Cent. A choice coin may be worth $5,000, an average coin $3,500 and a very low-end coin might only be worth $2,000. I’m not certain that these variations would be as extreme for, say, an 1854-C quarter eagle in slabbed AU55 but I do personally think a nice coin for the grade is already worth considerably more than an ugly one.

Getting back to my original point: why are certain coins undervalued? As I stated earlier, the major reason for this is that they are just not that popular. Another reason–one that is harder to give an explanation to–is that in any long series, it is inevitable that a percentage of the coins are “sleepers.” I previously mentioned that the lack of accurate pricing information in the market means that it is always going to be inevitable that a number of coins fall through the cracks. The value of being a specialist is that you will learn what coins are the sleepers before they become more widely known.

provided by coinlink.com

Comments

Coin Pricing Guides….

COIN PRICING GUIDES – Commentary by Laura Sperber

The Following  is from Legend Numismatics Hot Topics, A Commentary by Laura Sperber – Editor

There are so many issues that need work on. Coin pricing guides are in my sights right now. Before I begin this article, I must make sure everyone realizes the value of a coin is determined by its QUALITY,RARITY, DEMAND, AND SUPPLY-NOT whats written in a price guide.

A RECENT EXPEREIENCE ON MIS-INFORMATION

Recently we had a very rare coin for sale. The CDN (gray sheet WHOLESALE bid/ask) on the coin was $121,000/$131,000.00. We were offered $130,000.00 for the coin by a collector. Sounds reasonable-but it was far from what the coin was worth. The collector had no other information to go on. We missed placing the coin with him, and he most likely will never buy one because they all will be too expensive.

The last example of this type of coin that sold in major public auction was for $161,000.00 only a year ago (prior to that one sold for $230,000.00). You can never find one of these coins at a show-or even in auction. Buying one for less than $150,000.00 is pretty much impossible-even with the markets off. We did end up WHOLESALING the coin immediately for much more than the $130,000.00 we were offered! An FYI: this is just one small incident. We have had MANY situations similar to this happen just about every other day.

My point is-this was irresponsible price reporting. Obviously, the bids were never updated for at least a year. I get angered when its suggested its up to me to report a sale/purchase. If these people put out information and sell subscrptions for that service, then they should have reporters gathering it who understand the market. Do you do the reporting for your local newspaper? Its was clearly obvious they didn’t even have the resolve to check auction records. The prices they had for this coin clearly were NOT reliable, nor were they meaningful as a “starting point”.

Another fav of mine is when they are publish bids for coins with LESS then 5 graded. So when a junky specimen sells for a cheap price and that gets noted, then a great specimen comes up for sale, numerous buyers are priced out from the start because of MIS-information. Any knowledgable dealer will tell you that just about ALL the prices they have published for coins with pops of 5 or less are wrong. Why even have a price when the last coin may have sold 10 years ago? Continued

Provided by Coinlink.com

Comments

Portugal 2.5 euros 2009 - Portuguese language

Submitted by World Coin News
New circulating commemorative:
“Língua Portuguesa - Património Cultural da Europa”

LINK: Casa da Moeda
SPECIFICATIONS
Composition: CuNi
Diameter: 28.00 mm
Weight: 12.00 g
Mintage: 150,000
Artist: José Simão
Visit 1800blogger to see all of our industry leading blogs.

Comments

Portugal 2 euros 2009 - Lusophony Games

Submitted by World Coin News
New circulating commemorative:
“II Jogos da Lusofonia Lisboa 2009”

LINK: Casa da Moeda
LINK: Lusophony Games in Wikipedia
LINK: 2s Jogos da Lusofonia Lisboa 2009
SPECIFICATIONS
Diameter: 25.75 mm
Weight: 8.50 g
Mintage: 1,250,000
Artist: José Aurélio
Visit 1800blogger to see all of our industry leading blogs.

Comments

What Is The Oldest Metal Coin

Submitted by Ancient Coin Cleaning And Restoration

I must give credit for the following article to “Cais Archaeological & Cultural News”.. In the process of reading about ancient metal money I encountered the following article and I believe it is of interest to many of our members. The article did not provide an author’s name so [...]

Comments

« Previous entries